London Arbitration 5/23

A single message from Time Charterers (who were allegedly unpaid by sub-charterers) to Owners "Owners... decision not to discharge... to protect owners and charterers interests may be... prudent" was held not to amount to an instruction to Owners not to discharge the cargo. Nor did the B/L (under which Owners undertook to deliver the cargo) contain any lien entitling Time Charterers to give any such instruction. Time Charterers' damages claim failed.

Previous
Previous

London Arbitration 6/23

Next
Next

Rhine Shipping DMCC v Vitol SA [2023] EWHC 1265 – 26 May 2023 (Simon Birt KC)