London Arbitration 12/19

London Arbitration 12/19

“Under an amended Synacomex 90 c/p, an NOR was valid (by reason of c1.8 and 'WIPON') when served at the designated location (even if outside port limits), the intended loading place then being unavailable and the Master having warranted hold readine…

“Under an amended Synacomex 90 c/p, an NOR was valid (by reason of c1.8 and 'WIPON') when served at the designated location (even if outside port limits), the intended loading place then being unavailable and the Master having warranted hold readiness. Subsequent hold inspection failure did not invalidate the NOR (as in the Mexico I) because the c/p specified the laytime effects of hold failure.”

Hanna Szerszen
E. G. Arghyrakis & Co.
05th June 2019

Previous
Previous

Woodward & Anor v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Ltd [2019]

Next
Next

London Arbitration 11/19