London Arbitration 16/22

Further to an electrical breakdown, Time-Charterers first placed the Vessel off-hire, and then terminated the Charterparty (with cargo on board), relying on the C/P cancellation clause and a repudiatory breach. Whilst the breakdown inferred breach of delivery condition, the Tribunal held it was not repudiatory; nor had Charterers complied with cancellation clause notice requirements. Until the Vessel proceeded to the discharge port and delivered the cargo, she was not at Owners’ disposal and not redelivered; the C/P remained live but the vessel was, however, off-hire from the moment she could not follow Charterers’ orders until commencement of discharge.

Previous
Previous

Wilforce LLC & Anor v Ratu Shipping Co. SA & Anor [2022] EWHC 1190 – 20 May 2022 (Sir Nigel TEARE sitting as a Judge of the High Court with Nautical Assessors)

Next
Next

London Arbitration 16/22