London Arbitration 2/20

Arbitration
Written By Louise Glover

London Arbitration 2/20

“A fixture agreed by an exchange of emails concluded "owise as dean Gencon94 CP ind Cls Paramount...to be amended/ altered as per above main terms agreed...". The Tribunal, ruling on its own jurisdiction, found that the Gencon 94 Arbitration Clause …

“A fixture agreed by an exchange of emails concluded "owise as dean Gencon94 CP ind Cls Paramount...to be amended/ altered as per above main terms agreed...". The Tribunal, ruling on its own jurisdiction, found that the Gencon 94 Arbitration Clause (19(a)) was incorporated in the fixture: there was no established meaning of "main terms" therefore no reason to exclude Gencon provisions which might be regarded as "main° just because not specifically agreed in the main terms recap, regardless of the amount of detail.”

Antonino Cordopatri
E. G. Arghyrakis & Co.
15th April 2020

Louise Glover
Previous

Qatar National Bank (QPSC) v Force India, The Owners of the Yacht [2020]
Next

Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd v Reignwood International Investment (Group) Company limited [2020]