942 LMLN 2 - London Arbitration 1/16 [2016]

Claimant lay-up facility became involuntary bailee after termination of the lay-up agreement and should continue to provide services but was allowed to recover “costs and expenses”, which did not exclude indirect costs and a profit element.
Respondents entitled to recover the costs of the foreign proceedings brought in breach of the arbitration agreement; the Tribunal made no finding as to whether they could make an order for the removal of the vessels pursuant to section 48(5) of the Arbitration Act.

Previous
Previous

Glencore v. PT Tera Logistic Indonesia [2016]

Next
Next

Fulton Shipping Inc. v. Globalia Business Travel SAU [2015]