(2017) 972 LMLN 2— London Arbitration 9/17

Arbitration
Written By Louise Glover

(2017) 972 LMLN 2— London Arbitration 9/17

“After discharge operations in Chittagong were interrupted for 6.62 days due to a strike by barge labourers, it was held that laytime continued to run in full during the strike even though Owners did not provide notice of the strike to Charterers as…

“After discharge operations in Chittagong were interrupted for 6.62 days due to a strike by barge labourers, it was held that laytime continued to run in full during the strike even though Owners did not provide notice of the strike to Charterers as required by the General Strike Clause (Gencon 94), since both Owners and Charterers were fully aware of the strike's existence.”

Vasilis Bikakis
E. G. Arghyrakis & Co.
08th March 2017

Louise Glover
Previous

Nautical Challenge Ltd V Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd [2017]
Next

Su (aka Hsin Chi Su, Su Hsin Chi and Nobu Morimoto) v Clarksons Platou Futures Ltd & Anor [2017]