P v Q [2018]

P v Q [2018] EWHC 1399 — 11 June 2018 (Sir Richard Field)

“A long chain included 'middle' voyage charters (P/Q, Q/R, R/S) each with a clause imposing a time bar unless claims were notified and an arbitrator appointed within 13 months of final discharge. A cargo damage claim was brought against head owners …

“A long chain included 'middle' voyage charters (P/Q, Q/R, R/S) each with a clause imposing a time bar unless claims were notified and an arbitrator appointed within 13 months of final discharge. A cargo damage claim was brought against head owners after 11 months. Notice of an indemnity claim reached 'P' on the last day of the 13 month period remained unseen until the following day, so that notice to 'Q' and so on down the line was delayed. The Court construed the clause literally and strictly, rather than in the light of the chain. It also declined to extend P's time under s.12 of the Arbitration Act because although the circumstances were outside the reasonable contemplation of the parties, P did not act expeditiously and in a commercially appropriate fashion viz a viz Q.”

Rebecca Windsor
E. G. Arghyrakis & Co.
14th June 2018

Previous
Previous

Deep Sea Maritime Ltd v Monjasa A/S (The Alhani) [2018]

Next
Next

Grindrod Shipping PTE LTD V Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. LTD [2018]