Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd [2018]

Supreme Court
Written By Louise Glover

Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd [2018] UKSC 24— 16 May 2018 (Hale, Wilson, Sumption, Lloyd-Jones, Briggs LLJ)

“The Supreme Court held that the No Oral Modification (NOM) provision in a contract for occupation of office premises deprived a subsequent alleged oral agreement of any binding force as a contract variation. Parties who orally agree to the terms of…

“The Supreme Court held that the No Oral Modification (NOM) provision in a contract for occupation of office premises deprived a subsequent alleged oral agreement of any binding force as a contract variation. Parties who orally agree to the terms of a variation of the substance of their contractual relationship do not thereby impliedly agree to dispense with the NOM clause.”

Kozeta Osmani
E. G. Arghyrakis & Co.
30th May 2018

Louise Glover
Previous

Grindrod Shipping PTE LTD V Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. LTD [2018]
Next

Navigator Spirit SA v Five Oceans Salvage SA [2018]