Case Summaries

Join our Case Summary Mailing List

Want to receive our weekly Case Summary direct to your inbox? Click below!

Commercial Court Louise Glover Commercial Court Louise Glover

Pan Oceanic Chartering Inc v Unipec UK Co. Limited and Unipec Asia Co. Limited [2016]

“Owners' brokers under a COA claimed damages from the traders/ charterers who had slowed and then ceased performance, depriving them of commission. The claim, based on tortious interference with contractual relations, was dismissed by the Court as the two necessary elements of the tort were absent. There was no contractual right to the commission (as opposed to a minimum expectation of it) and no breach by the owners of the brokerage contract.”

Read More
Commercial Court Louise Glover Commercial Court Louise Glover

Regulus Ship Services Pte Ltd v Lundin Services BV and lkdam Productions SA (Costs) [2016]

“By an ocean towage contract on BIMCO terms, owners of the tug boat claimed demurrage for delays due to extra ballast. The Court found that the owners of the tow breached their obligation under the Towcon to provide the vessel "in light ballast condition" as this means "ensuring physical fitness, primarily stability, for the tow's voyage". However, the claim was rejected because it was not proved that the breach caused the delay under clause 17 of the Towcon.”

Read More
Commercial Court Louise Glover Commercial Court Louise Glover

Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation & Ors v Privalov & Ors (Costs) [2016]

“After Defendants were awarded $59.8 million for damages caused by worldwide freezing orders against them, they were now able to recover 50% of their costs, and not 100%, since 1) Defendants did not recover their full damages claimed (some $387 million), 2) large financial investments were made towards issues on which Defendants failed, and 3) Defendants provided untruthful evidence in Court.”

Read More
Commercial Court Louise Glover Commercial Court Louise Glover

Vinnlustodin HF Vatryggingaffelag Islands HF v Sea Tank Shipping AS (formerly known as TANK INVEST AS) [2016]

“Carriers argued that their liability in respect of a parcel of some 2000mt fish oil could be restricted pursuant to Article IV Rule 5 of the Hague Rules which provides for limitation per "package or unit". The Court held that the word "unit" refers to a physical item that is not packaged, rather than to a unit of measurement. Therefore, Hague Rules limitation does not apply to bulk cargoes.”

Read More